Reference 9

Level I Good quality evidence Systematic review of RCTs with
consistent findings
High quality individual RCT
Level II Limited quality patient
orientated evidence
Systematic review of lower quality
studies or studies with inconsistent
findings
Low quality clinical trial
Cohort studies
Case-control studies
Level III Other Consensus guidelines, extrapolations
from bench research, usual practice,
opinion, disease-oriented evidence
(intermediate or physiologic outcomes
only), or case series

[9] Sevoflurane: Johannesson GP, Floren M, Lindahl SG. Sevoflurane for ENT-surgery in children. A comparison with halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 546-50. AND Meretoja OA, Taivainen T, Raiha L, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K. Sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or halothane nitrous-oxide for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 767-771.AND Kataria B et al. A comparison of sevoflurane to halothane in paediatric surgical patients: results of a multicenter international study. Paediatric Anaesthesia 1996; 6: 283-293. AND Paris ST, Cafferkey M et al. Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane for outpatient dental anaesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 280-284. AND Agnor RC, Sikich N, Lerman J. Single-breath vital capacity rapid inhalation induction in children: 8% sevoflurane versus 5% halothane. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 379-38 AND Blayney MR, Malins AF, Cooper GM. Cardiac arrhythmias in children during outpatient general anaesthesia for dentistry: a prospective, randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 1864-66 AND Viitanen H, Baer G, Koivu H, Annila P. The haemodynamic and holter-electrocardiogram changes during halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia for adenoidectomy in children aged one to three years. Anesth Analg 1999; 87: 1423-5.